Hosting Germany: Hetzner vs AWS vs Vercel
Where should DACH companies host their SaaS application? A technical and legal comparison of the most important options.
Why hosting location matters
For companies in the DACH region, choosing a hosting provider is more than a technical decision. Since Schrems II and stricter GDPR enforcement, data protection authorities have clear requirements: personal data of European citizens must not be transferred to the US without proper safeguards.
This affects not only your database, but also CDN nodes, log files, error tracking, and even build systems.
GDPR
Legal basis
Since 2018, tightened by Schrems II
€20M
Max. fine
Or 4% of annual revenue
72h
Notification duty
For data breaches to authorities
The candidates
Hetzner (Germany)
Hetzner is a German hoster with data centers in Falkenstein, Nuremberg, and Helsinki. Known for the best price-performance ratio in Europe.
Strengths:
- Unbeatable prices for dedicated and cloud servers
- Data centers in Germany (Falkenstein, Nuremberg)
- Full GDPR compliance, German company
- Excellent network connectivity (1+ Gbit/s included)
- No vendor lock-in (standard Linux, Docker, Kubernetes)
Weaknesses:
- No managed Kubernetes (as of 2026)
- Fewer managed services than AWS
- No global CDN
- Support via ticket only, no enterprise SLA
AWS eu-central (Frankfurt)
Amazon Web Services operates a region in Frankfurt (eu-central-1). Largest cloud platform worldwide with over 200 services.
Strengths:
- Most comprehensive service portfolio (200+ services)
- Enterprise-grade SLAs and support
- Auto-scaling, serverless, managed everything
- Global infrastructure when needed
- Frankfurt region for GDPR compliance
Weaknesses:
- Complex and expensive, especially for small teams
- Costs hard to predict (pay-per-use)
- US company (CLOUD Act: US authorities can demand data access)
- Vendor lock-in with AWS-specific services
- Over-engineering risk for small projects
Vercel (Edge/Global)
Vercel specializes in frontend hosting and serverless functions. Known as the company behind Next.js.
Strengths:
- Best developer experience for frontend projects
- Automatic preview deployments per pull request
- Global edge network (fastest TTFB)
- Zero-config for Next.js, Nuxt, Vite
Weaknesses:
- No database hosting (needs external DB)
- Serverless limits (timeout, cold starts)
- US company, data distributed across edge nodes worldwide
- GDPR compliance only with additional configuration
- Expensive at high traffic (bandwidth costs)
The comparison
| Criterion | Hetzner | AWS Frankfurt | Vercel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Germany | Frankfurt (US company) | Global (US company) |
| GDPR | Full compliance | Compliant with DPA | Limited |
| CLOUD Act | Not affected | Affected | Affected |
| Price (comparable) | €20-€50/mo | €80-€200/mo | €20-€150/mo |
| Managed services | Few | Very many | Frontend-focused |
| Scaling | Manual/Docker | Auto-scaling | Auto (Edge) |
| Vendor lock-in | None | Medium-High | Medium |
Monthly costs (comparable configuration)
When to use which provider?
Hetzner
Ideal when
- Budget-conscious startups and SMBs
- Maximum GDPR compliance required
- Team has DevOps skills (Docker, Linux)
- Dedicated servers for compute-heavy workloads
Not ideal when
- No managed Kubernetes
- No global CDN included
- Few managed services
AWS Frankfurt
Ideal when
- Enterprise with complex requirements
- Auto-scaling and serverless needed
- Global expansion planned
- Budget for cloud expertise available
Not ideal when
- CLOUD Act is a risk for your business
- Small teams without cloud experience
- Costs must be predictable
Vercel
Ideal when
- Pure frontend/Jamstack project
- Next.js or Nuxt in use
- Fast iteration with preview deployments
- Global performance matters
Not ideal when
- Backend/database hosting needed
- Strict GDPR requirements
- High traffic (bandwidth costs)
The hybrid solution
In practice, many DACH companies use a combination:
- Frontend on Vercel (fastest delivery, preview deployments)
- Backend + database on Hetzner (GDPR, costs)
- AWS only for specific services (e.g., S3 for uploads, SES for email)
Recommended architecture for DACH SaaS
Frontend
Vercel or Hetzner with CDN (Cloudflare)
Next.js/Vite, edge caching, preview deployments
API + Backend
Hetzner Cloud or dedicated server
NestJS/Express, Docker, PostgreSQL
Database
Hetzner or AWS RDS (Frankfurt)
PostgreSQL, daily backups, encryption
Email + Storage
AWS SES (Frankfurt) + S3 or Hetzner Object Storage
Transactional emails, file uploads
CLOUD Act: The underestimated risk
The US CLOUD Act (2018) allows US authorities to demand data from US companies, even when that data is physically stored in the EU. This affects AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, Vercel, and all other US providers.
For most companies, this is a theoretical risk. But in certain industries (healthcare, finance, public sector), it can be a dealbreaker.
Alternatives for high data protection requirements:
- Hetzner (DE), IONOS (DE), Open Telekom Cloud (DE)
- Exoscale (CH), Infomaniak (CH)
Conclusion
There is no "best" hoster. The right choice depends on your project, budget, and data protection requirements.
- Hetzner when cost and GDPR are the priority
- AWS Frankfurt when enterprise features and scaling are needed
- Vercel when developer experience and frontend performance matter
For most SaaS startups in the DACH region, Hetzner + Cloudflare CDN is the best starting point. You can always migrate to AWS later when requirements grow.
Related Topics
We're hiring Senior Engineers
100% Remote, DACH